Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

Dating First-date jitters? Hoping for a second date? Moving on to a full blown relationship? Share your journey and advice here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Jacquesne's Avatar

Jacquesne knows the answer...42

Volunteer Community Leader

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 1,287

See profile

I'll work on brevity.

Did I just win? =)
- November 2nd, 2009, 04:12 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#61   Reply With Quote
Faira's Avatar

Faira is probably trying to avoid doing schoolwork.

Veteran

Join Date: Jul 2008

Posts: 1,587

See profile

Jacquesne wrote :
Male arrogance?

I call it male confidence.

And excellence. And anyone who disagrees is obviously just jealous!

I suppose I didn't think of it that way. I have trouble telling when something is being chauvinistic or not.

Guys have a very un-PC path to navigate. On one hand we're supposed to be men; confident, assertive, powerful, etc. On the other hand those things are bad and put women down. And men aren't supposed to be bad. Or maybe we are. I don't know. Eventually I'm just going to give up and just be a bad guy. It's so much easier and pretty much all my friends have already given up. I'm just stubborn, I guess.

And yes, that is me disagreeing. Obviously guys don't avoid virgins. If they did how would there be non-virgins? Last I checked they came from virgins sleeping with guys who are sleeping with a virgin at the time. Duh.

Mostly what I've been reading in this thread is that virginity is something we'd prefer to avoid. How does that have anything to do with its sacredness? How is that controlling women and their sexuality if we're more comfortable with women who are already comfortable with their sexuality? Isn't this exactly the opposite of what you're accusing us of?

We're not saying our sexual prowess is going to unhinge a virgin. We're saying that there are many people in our society who put a heavy burden upon virginity. Mothers still tell their daughters that the first time is special and they should "save" it for the right guy, don't they? So when women "lose" that virginity she has all these societal preconceptions about it. Men, on the other hand, are encouraged to lose it (and in many cultures it's practically a coming-of-age ritual).

The "destruction" of her social fabric is what unhinges a female virgin, not our incredible sexual powers. Now she has pressure on herself that this guy has to be "the one," she has guilt if it was an accident or part of the moment and now she considers herself "dirty" and sleeps with every guy she can, etc. You can talk about the Evil Patriarchy all you want but ultimately these things are not something the average guy pushes onto women. More likely those things were taught to her by her mother (who, of course, was brainwashed by the Patriarchy...ugh).

As for older virgins generally speaking people are not virgins long after their 30s and 40s. It's very rare and it has always been very rare. Married couples are generally not virgins. Historically most people get married (and used to get married much earlier, further decreasing the likelihood of older virgins). And those who didn't were looked at with even more suspicion than people today.

So when you see an older virgin you have to ask yourself why for both genders. Are they someone deeply religious (or whatever) who's waiting for the right person? Are they just bad at relationships? Are they antisocial? It doesn't have to be a bad reason but the longer time goes on the likelihood of someone not forming a deep enough relationship with the opposite sex to have intercourse gets lower and lower. Once you get into the late 40s and 50s people are generally married. And in the process probably not virgins. It's not a Patriarchal Conspiracy, it's statistics.

And women do the same thing to try and make a guy's first time a good one. I've talked to plenty of women who are concerned with have sex with a virgin because they are worried about his awkwardness, worried that he'll be too nervous, etc. I would think it's more likely a virgin guy would have trouble in relationships than a virgin girl.

The guys are just saying that they would want a girl's first time to be special, not just spontaneous "in the moment" sex. Something she's sure she wants. This is taking her feelings into account, not trying to control her. It's not a favor, it's respect and concern.

Ugh. Maybe I should just go with the whole bad guy thing. I am, after all, a White Male, the Source of All Things Wrong With The World. I could just lie and say I hate women and all other races besides my own (whatever that is) and I wouldn't have to play the apologetic monster trying to fight against my evil animal instincts.

Unfortunately I'm not willing to give up that easily. Because I'm arrogant, of course!

Jacquesne
Sounds like I hit a nerve.

Thanks for putting a whole lot of words in my mouth. Seriously, I have no idea where that second-last paragraph came from.

I really don't see how you've helped your case here...I think that in some spots you've actually made things worse.

When I read your first post, I thought: "Patronizing". This post...I just don't know what to make of.

Have a great evening.
- November 2nd, 2009, 04:13 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#62   Reply With Quote
Benevolence32's Avatar

Benevolence32 is not looking forward to shorter days and colder weather

Enthusiast

Join Date: Feb 2009

Posts: 587

See profile

Turtle_speed wrote :
I agree with Nightling. Why any guy would value sleeping with a virgin as a notch on his bedpost is beyond me. From everything I read here, men like best women who know what they are doing. So the real thrill here is not the sex with the virgin but the bragging about it later. To which I say big, fat, hairy deal. The so-called "virgin" could lie to the guy just to get him to sleep with her and all his buddies know that he could be just lying to them as well. There's no proof, and nothing anyone has ever said makes me think there would be anything special about sex with a virgin either. But so far Beagle is the only guy who is insisting it virginity is still worth anything to the younger guys, but also equally repulsive to the older guys.
I'll have to disagree..again I'll refer to the Natalie Dylan story the woman that auctioned off her virginity. The man that made the 3.7 million dollar bid isn't even from an Islamic country he's from Australia. She also reportedly received thousands upon thousands of bids.
- November 2nd, 2009, 04:23 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#63   Reply With Quote
j0hn8andy's Avatar

j0hn8andy .....Take off the Rings.....That's the Goal.....

Enthusiast

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 947

See profile

Jacquesne wrote :
I'll work on brevity.

Did I just win? =)
You can be short! You crack me up!

j8a
- November 2nd, 2009, 04:27 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#64   Reply With Quote
trixie1868's Avatar

trixie1868 has a plan to sort it out

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 960

See profile

Jacquesne wrote :
Male arrogance?

I call it male confidence.

And excellence. And anyone who disagrees is obviously just jealous!

I suppose I didn't think of it that way. I have trouble telling when something is being chauvinistic or not.

Guys have a very un-PC path to navigate. On one hand we're supposed to be men; confident, assertive, powerful, etc. On the other hand those things are bad and put women down. And men aren't supposed to be bad. Or maybe we are. I don't know. Eventually I'm just going to give up and just be a bad guy. It's so much easier and pretty much all my friends have already given up. I'm just stubborn, I guess.

And yes, that is me disagreeing. Obviously guys don't avoid virgins. If they did how would there be non-virgins? Last I checked they came from virgins sleeping with guys who are sleeping with a virgin at the time. Duh.

Mostly what I've been reading in this thread is that virginity is something we'd prefer to avoid. How does that have anything to do with its sacredness? How is that controlling women and their sexuality if we're more comfortable with women who are already comfortable with their sexuality? Isn't this exactly the opposite of what you're accusing us of?

We're not saying our sexual prowess is going to unhinge a virgin. We're saying that there are many people in our society who put a heavy burden upon virginity. Mothers still tell their daughters that the first time is special and they should "save" it for the right guy, don't they? So when women "lose" that virginity she has all these societal preconceptions about it. Men, on the other hand, are encouraged to lose it (and in many cultures it's practically a coming-of-age ritual).

The "destruction" of her social fabric is what unhinges a female virgin, not our incredible sexual powers. Now she has pressure on herself that this guy has to be "the one," she has guilt if it was an accident or part of the moment and now she considers herself "dirty" and sleeps with every guy she can, etc. You can talk about the Evil Patriarchy all you want but ultimately these things are not something the average guy pushes onto women. More likely those things were taught to her by her mother (who, of course, was brainwashed by the Patriarchy...ugh).

As for older virgins generally speaking people are not virgins long after their 30s and 40s. It's very rare and it has always been very rare. Married couples are generally not virgins. Historically most people get married (and used to get married much earlier, further decreasing the likelihood of older virgins). And those who didn't were looked at with even more suspicion than people today.

So when you see an older virgin you have to ask yourself why for both genders. Are they someone deeply religious (or whatever) who's waiting for the right person? Are they just bad at relationships? Are they antisocial? It doesn't have to be a bad reason but the longer time goes on the likelihood of someone not forming a deep enough relationship with the opposite sex to have intercourse gets lower and lower. Once you get into the late 40s and 50s people are generally married. And in the process probably not virgins. It's not a Patriarchal Conspiracy, it's statistics.

And women do the same thing to try and make a guy's first time a good one. I've talked to plenty of women who are concerned with have sex with a virgin because they are worried about his awkwardness, worried that he'll be too nervous, etc. I would think it's more likely a virgin guy would have trouble in relationships than a virgin girl.

The guys are just saying that they would want a girl's first time to be special, not just spontaneous "in the moment" sex. Something she's sure she wants. This is taking her feelings into account, not trying to control her. It's not a favor, it's respect and concern.

Ugh. Maybe I should just go with the whole bad guy thing. I am, after all, a White Male, the Source of All Things Wrong With The World. I could just lie and say I hate women and all other races besides my own (whatever that is) and I wouldn't have to play the apologetic monster trying to fight against my evil animal instincts.

Unfortunately I'm not willing to give up that easily. Because I'm arrogant, of course!

Jacquesne
weird post.
- November 2nd, 2009, 04:42 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#65   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

littlebluemonkeymind's Avatar

littlebluemonkeymind meh

Power Poster

Join Date: Jul 2008

Posts: 7,656

See profile

scarlet13 wrote :
Marry me.

I would have given you 5 stars, but someone already beat me to it.
Wait, didn't you just propose to me a couple weeks ago? Should we go to the polyamory thread now?

Any man past the age of about 20 who is interested in a virgin (or is excited by the idea of a virgin, or considers one a 'score' or of higher value than a non-virgin) who isn't doing so from devout religious conviction is creepy. And I'm being generous with the devout religious caveat.

I second the arrogance, with the exception of some earlier posters that refused to participate (D_Lion and TP come to mind). Regardless of what you may have been led to believe up till now, there is not a great deal of trauma associated with losing one's virginity (unless it is lost in a traumatic way, i.e. abuse) and those are not magic wands between your legs with the power to drive women out of their minds with a mere touch (although I confess they are fun to play with).

Dating a virgin, male or female, is nothing more than dating someone with a different sexual history than you have. The reason female virginity is more highly regarded is, to some extent cultural, but is also about ego - being the first to break ground, so to speak. Most women prefer a man who already knows how to drive a stick shift. There's nothing I hate worse than a lot of granny-clutching and lurching around.

Fetishizing anything rather than seeing another individual as just an individual is creepy. Period.

Last edited by littlebluemonkeymind; November 2nd, 2009 at 05:31 pm. Reason: I reserve the right to make an exception for sacrifices and spells...
- November 2nd, 2009, 05:03 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#66   Reply With Quote
Jacquesne's Avatar

Jacquesne knows the answer...42

Volunteer Community Leader

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 1,287

See profile

My second-last paragraph came from my first real paragraph starting with "Guys have a very un-PC path..."

It was a direct response to "the sacredness of women's virginity says a lot about its role in society: controlling women and their sexuality." and "Anyone else hearing a ton of male arrogance in this thread?" If I read the first sentence in context of the second one I read this as implying "men's attitude towards a woman's virginity is designed to control women and their sexuality." Am I correct so far?

So I disagreed with this in quite some detail and disagreed that men are trying to control women and drew the conclusion, based on context, that you believe men controlling women is a bad thing (which I agree with).

So if we, by our responses, are arrogant and controlling, and these things are bad, therefore we are bad. If A=B and B=C then A=C, right?

Perhaps I did put words in your mouth. I may have been having flashbacks to my Gender and Society class where your post was used almost word for word except the word "patriarchy" was used more often. I do apologize for arguing against what I perceived to be your position rather than perhaps what it actually is.

This was my summary of your response in my head that I was responding to, to clarify..."Society, and the men who control it, perpetuate the 'value' of virginity because they want to maintain control over female sexuality. So what I'm hearing in this thread from arrogant men is that they are saying that they cause women to lose control by having sex with a virgin, that older female virgins must be 'broken' somehow, and that the men are saying sex is a 'gift' to women."

This read to me like men are at fault for her behavior and we think women's behavior revolves around us. This is what I was arguing against.

Perhaps the part where I stated that you implied men were bad is false and, if saying we are controlling and arrogant is indeed not an insult, I take those statements back and apologize. Intent is often difficult to read through text and I make (a lot of) mistakes.

The rest, however, I stand by. The sacredness of virginity is constructed...by women, for women, as a throwback to times when birth control was unavailable and losing your virginity meant the real risk of pregnancy and all the responsibility that entailed. Protecting virginity and valuing it has much more importance for women than men. Which is why we're saying we'd prefer non-virgins.

Likewise virginity after a certain age is more of a stigma for men than women. Men have a lot of social pressure to be sexually active. An older woman virgin is perhaps "saving herself," a noble cause. An older man is more likely a social misfit who other women rejected. I'm not making these stereotypes up and I don't see how this stigma is against women in particular as you implied.

And saying that being sensitive to a woman and making sure she is comfortable with losing her virginity before getting caught up in passion and having her regret it is somehow us being arrogant and pretentious is also false, as I said before and other posters have said. This last one is what made me draw the conclusion that your position is that men are the "bad guys" here and led directly to my first and final paragraphs. It didn't come out of nowhere. After all, how else could you have come to the conclusion that men had bad intentions by being cautious? The idea that we would do it for her didn't seem to factor into it.

I don't mean to be patronizing. I do find that an interesting choice of words after my use of "patriarchy." If I misunderstood you then I really am sorry; I don't like putting words in people's mouth or misinterpreting them if I can help it. Those are the conclusions I drew based on what you wrote and the context of it being a response to what I wrote. I've tried to explain how I came to those conclusions.

Take care.

Jacquesne
- November 2nd, 2009, 05:10 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#67   Reply With Quote
PR_Princess's Avatar

PR_Princess Eid Mubarak!

Pacesetter

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 443

See profile

Fetishizing anything rather than seeing another individual as just an individual is creepy. Period.
+1....definitely a pet peeve of mine--- reducing a person to his/her body parts instead of looking at the person as a whole Where is the humanity in that!
- November 2nd, 2009, 05:11 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#68   Reply With Quote
Benevolence32's Avatar

Benevolence32 is not looking forward to shorter days and colder weather

Enthusiast

Join Date: Feb 2009

Posts: 587

See profile

Wow I didn't see any arrogance at all from anyone, people are seriously projecting. Thou doth protest too much.
- November 2nd, 2009, 05:16 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#69   Reply With Quote
saulgoode's Avatar

Unregistered

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 1,310

See profile

Eventually, sex gets old, even if it's just with one person.

My point, which I see's been completely lost, is that holding onto your virginity is fine and all -- who cares, really, it's a personal choice -- but attaching too much emotion to the act of sex is unrealistic.

You don't date someone for sex. God help you if you marry for sex.

There are 168 hours in a week, and you're lucky to spend half of one of those hours having sex. You'd better have a hell of a lot more to be attached to than your hymen and your morals.

Personally, I could care less. I dated a few women who refused to have sex until we met some mark in our relationship, and one woman who flat-out refused to have sex again until she was married (a born-again virgin).

'Swhatever.


- Saul
- November 2nd, 2009, 05:22 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#70   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“oh if a girl forgets to hug me at the end of our date, i would think she's not interested. I think he's thinking the same thing!!! oh what was I gonna say..oh yeah, don't be too paranoid!! you ... ” – Andrea8823

Join the “always so paranoid” discussion

“it may not be able to be commercialized but i just purchased three times the food i normally do! ditto, on the prayer warrior.” – notyet

Join the “This is the Day !” discussion

“I have. It's possible that it's only happened when they feel off the list completely (i.e. hadn't viewed in 2 weeks), but I'm pretty certain I've seen the view date update to be more recent before.” – cardguy

Join the “How to find this?” discussion

“Hmmmm...but if you met a great woman and she lived in the city but refused to live in the burbs or a small city/town, would you compromise to continue the relationship?... I just think there are so ... ” – bigfincat

Join the “Hypocritical Match?” discussion

“Help me please. I'm not socially well adjusted but I am a good looking guy with plenty of options in this new school I just started working in.. or do I still have those options? I flirt in general, ... ” – LeeInCentralPa

Join the “Is flirting in general bad?” discussion

“Ben and Jerrys is bad????? ” – FruitaBu

Join the “Why overshare?” discussion

“Each person has his or her own set of correct behaviors, depending on their age, rearing, socio-economic status, religious inclination, financial ability etc etc etc. We can't and shouldn't attempt ... ” – parakeetjordan

Join the “Ethical Considerations In Dating Multiple People” discussion

“Playing "Second Life" while you, a real person and the with whom one he wants to be in relationship, is really rude. It's like asking you over and then spending all his time talking to his buddies. ... ” – Faira

Join the “Conflict over TV/movie habits.” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0