Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

Christian Singles This is a Discussion Group for Christian Singles Feel Free to Post any Threads that are Related to Christian Dating. Note: Seekers welcome.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
chawks64's Avatar

chawks64 can finally put country music back n the lineup again.

Virtuoso

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 3,946

See profile

In my experience, disagreements will either solidify your own position or make you question why you hold them in the first place. Either is good. But I do believe mutual respect has to be there or neither side will be really listening to the other, just rattling off their beliefs without actually thinking why they hold them to be true.
- October 24th, 2009, 06:10 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#11   Reply With Quote
dwreese182's Avatar

dwreese182 Pag-ibig ng isla

Veteran

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 2,018

See profile

FaithNGod wrote :
concrete conclusion that has no holes in the FACT that Jesus is God according to the Word of God.
Correction. "'Belief' that Jesus is God". There is no actual evidence that Jesus was born a virgin or that he was resurrected (spelling?). On the flip side, there is also no evidence supporting that it didn't happen. However, there is also no evidence to disprove that there is a Chinese tea cup floating around Saturn.

If you believe the word of god (aka Bible, a book) is fact, then you just merely "believe" that it is a fact, which doesn't make it anymore true. Like I said in another post. There is only one way to prove that any religion is the truth, and again, most aren't willing to do that prematurely.
- October 25th, 2009, 07:20 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#12   Reply With Quote
Cloud_Strife's Avatar

Cloud_Strife is a big ol scaredy-cat!

Quick Study

Join Date: Sep 2009

Posts: 143

See profile

dwreese182 wrote :
Correction. "'Belief' that Jesus is God". There is no actual evidence that Jesus was born a virgin or that he was resurrected (spelling?). On the flip side, there is also no evidence supporting that it didn't happen. However, there is also no evidence to disprove that there is a Chinese tea cup floating around Saturn.

If you believe the word of god (aka Bible, a book) is fact, then you just merely "believe" that it is a fact, which doesn't make it anymore true. Like I said in another post. There is only one way to prove that any religion is the truth, and again, most aren't willing to do that prematurely.
When beliefs contain the power of eternal life, "facts" as you call them are overrated. All of the "facts" will burn with the rest of the world as God creates a new heaven and a new earth. Then what will be a fact?
- October 25th, 2009, 08:59 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#13   Reply With Quote
notyet's Avatar

notyet it's alive!

Virtuoso

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 3,222

See profile

i have at last heard back from my final pick for CS administrator- denniswisconsin. thanks for accepting!

dennis, you will find all you need to know about spurs at this link.

<):-D

Last edited by notyet; October 25th, 2009 at 09:25 am.
- October 25th, 2009, 09:23 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#14   Reply With Quote
notyet's Avatar

notyet it's alive!

Virtuoso

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 3,222

See profile

dwreese182 wrote :
Correction. "'Belief' that Jesus is God". There is no actual evidence that Jesus was born a virgin or that he was resurrected (spelling?). On the flip side, there is also no evidence supporting that it didn't happen. However, there is also no evidence to disprove that there is a Chinese tea cup floating around Saturn.

If you believe the word of god (aka Bible, a book) is fact, then you just merely "believe" that it is a fact, which doesn't make it anymore true. Like I said in another post. There is only one way to prove that any religion is the truth, and again, most aren't willing to do that prematurely.
is it possible to hijack my own thread?

?:-/

you are right- much of the bible cannot be proven scientifically. but then again, it is not a scientific text. it is a religious text that records historical events. and history cannot be proven scientifically- or sometimes at all.

to go to the absurd- prove to me that abraham lincoln existed. i'll wait...

his documents? his manuscripts? prove to me that is his hand writing. his tomb you say? let's exhume the body and run dna tests. us government won't let you do that? sorry! and even if you could- all that you would prove is that there is a body buried under a stone that says, "here lies lincoln" or words to that effect.

but we know he lived, right? yes we do. and i also believe he did. but that he lived and did all that is claimed of him cannot be proven scientifically.

to go to my other favorite extreme- socrates. he lived, right? an historical figure of great importance. no one doubts that he gave a speech to the athenian republic condemning them and was then summarily executed. but he never wrote a thing! not one thing. where is his body? his tomb?

the only evidence we have of his life is from the writings of one of his disciples. one! and yet no one doubts that socrates lived. but that disciple, plato, surely we can prove he lived, right? the oldest manuscript of plato's apology that we have dates to about 900 a.d., over 1,300 years after the execution of socrates! the next oldest manuscript is in venice and dates from the 13th century a.d.!!

the difference between the life of christ and the life of socrates? jesus' life is better documented. Rylands Papyrus contains portions of the gospel of john and dates to less than one hundred years after the crucifixion of jesus. socrates life was recorded by one contemporary. jesus' by at least eight contemporaries- at least five of whom were eye witnesses.

but we doubt that jesus lived and did all that was recorded of him while socrates is taught in every school. the reason? jesus claimed to be god. and more- was god. and if he is god- and he is- that demands we take action on his claim.

and few of us want to do that. none of us want to be accountable. we all want to live as we desire. i'll end with a reference. i have posted it numerous times these last few months. we can all of look it up. and we should.

romans 3:10-18

Last edited by notyet; October 25th, 2009 at 12:52 pm.
- October 25th, 2009, 11:04 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#15   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

dwreese182's Avatar

dwreese182 Pag-ibig ng isla

Veteran

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 2,018

See profile

notyet wrote :
is it possible to hijack my own thread?
I believe you just did. lol

notyet wrote :
?:-/

you are right- much of the bible cannot be proven scientifically. but then again, it is not a scientific text. it is a religious text that records historical events. and history cannot be proven scientifically- or sometimes at all.

to go to the absurd- prove to me that abraham lincoln existed. i'll wait...

his documents? his manuscripts? prove to me that is his hand writing. his tomb you say? let's exhume the body and run dna tests. us government won't let you do that? sorry! and even if you could- all that you would prove is that there is a body buried under a stone that says, "here lies lincoln" or words to that effect.

but we know he lived, right? yes we do. and i also believe he did. but that he lived and did all that is claimed of him cannot be proven scientifically.

to go to my other favorite extreme- socrates. he lived, right? an historical figure of great importance. no one doubts that he gave a speech to the athenian republic condemning them and was then summarily executed. but he never wrote a thing! not one thing. where is his body? his tomb?

the only evidence we have of his life is from the writings of one of his disciples. one! and yet no one doubts that socrates lived. but that disciple, plato, surely we can prove he lived, right? the oldest manuscript of plato's apology that we have dates to about 900 a.d., over 1,300 years after the execution of socrates! the next oldest manuscript is in venice and dates from the 13th century a.d.!!

the difference between the life of christ and the life of socrates? jesus' life is better documented. Rylands Papyrus contains portions of the gospel of john and dates to less than one hundred years after the crucifixion of jesus. socrates life was recorded by one contemporary. jesus' by at least eight contemporaries- at least five of whom were eye witnesses.

but we doubt that jesus lived and did all that was recorded of him while socrates is taught in every school. the reason? jesus claimed to be god. and more- was god. and if he is god- and he is- that demands we take action on his claim.

and few of us want to do that. none of us want to be accountable. we all want to live as we desire. i'll end with a reference. i have posted it numerous times these last few months. we can all of look it up. and we should.

romans 3:10-18
I never said that I didn't believe he existed or believe in what he "taught". (which I've heard somewhere that if you add up everything he said in the bible would only amount to two hours of dialog). I fully agree with his message of not judging, giving to the needy and just being kind to people in general.

I am arguing his virgin birth, claim as a god and supposed resurrection. Which I believe that no one witnessed, correct me if I'm wrong. If Lincoln, or anyone else, had made that claim I would seriously doubt that bit of information as well.
- October 27th, 2009, 09:17 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#16   Reply With Quote
Cloud_Strife's Avatar

Cloud_Strife is a big ol scaredy-cat!

Quick Study

Join Date: Sep 2009

Posts: 143

See profile

dwreese182 wrote :
I am arguing his virgin birth, claim as a god and supposed resurrection. Which I believe that no one witnessed, correct me if I'm wrong.
All three of those things had multiple witnesses, and the as for the latter two items, Jesus himself proclaimed he was the Son of God, and he also appeared to many disciples after his resurrection as a witness to his own resurrection. His virgin birth was of course witnessed by at least both his human parents.

Back to being the son of God, there was also the testimony of John the Baptist and the sign of the spirit descending on him as a dove.

There was also the mountaintop where I believe it was James and Peter who witnessed the voice of God saying "This is my son".
- October 27th, 2009, 09:34 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#17   Reply With Quote
coeuri's Avatar

coeuri has a new man in her life - her grandson.

Veteran

Join Date: Jul 2008

Posts: 1,902

See profile

So if you can hijack your own thread, does that mean that if I am driving from point A to point B and decide to go meandering to J or H instead, that I have stolen my own car?
- October 27th, 2009, 08:14 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#18   Reply With Quote
dwreese182's Avatar

dwreese182 Pag-ibig ng isla

Veteran

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 2,018

See profile

Cloud_Strife wrote :
All three of those things had multiple witnesses, and the as for the latter two items, Jesus himself proclaimed he was the Son of God, and he also appeared to many disciples after his resurrection as a witness to his own resurrection. His virgin birth was of course witnessed by at least both his human parents.

Back to being the son of God, there was also the testimony of John the Baptist and the sign of the spirit descending on him as a dove.

There was also the mountaintop where I believe it was James and Peter who witnessed the voice of God saying "This is my son".
No offense intended here but I don't give much credit to people who hear "voices". These days we have a word for people who hear voices, Schizophrenics. How many people have claimed to have heard God's voice or said that God came to them in a dream in recent decades? How many deaths have occurred due to these "voices" telling them to do something? Did God talk to them? Is there any way to disprove that it truly wasn't God talking to them? God has hardly made his presence known since biblical times. I see this as humans becoming better informed of their surroundings and not relying on tall tales or magic to explain the unknown.

Seeing Jesus after his death, well hallucinations can occur due to d.r.u.g use (which drugs used for treating illness in those days were not exactly FDA approved) and illness.

As for the parents witnessing the virgin birth, well, there are other explanations for this as well. What would have happened to a woman in those days if she was caught having an affair? Just a thought. I would never have been gullible enough to believe this story if my wife were to tell me such a thing.

Of course I have no evidence of any of this, I just see these explanations far more logical than by means of magic or the supernatural.
- October 29th, 2009, 06:42 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#19   Reply With Quote
dwreese182's Avatar

dwreese182 Pag-ibig ng isla

Veteran

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 2,018

See profile

coeuri wrote :
So if you can hijack your own thread, does that mean that if I am driving from point A to point B and decide to go meandering to J or H instead, that I have stolen my own car?
I would think this would be more like having ADD. Not so much stealing of your own car.
- October 29th, 2009, 06:45 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#20   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Not that my girls begging had anything to do with it, but we all spent the night at Laura's, up early to feed and walk the horses. Sunday had a birthday dinner at my mother's (w/Laura, my daughters ... ” – olneyjeeps

Join the “Monday November 23rd weekend & date roundup!” discussion

“I see it a bit different. You can be warm and still know how to pace your sharing and open up in timely ways. Being warm means being emotionall generous, friendly, loving...it doesn't mean dumping ... ” – HappyandLight

Join the “Why overshare?” discussion

“It doesn't bother me if they say they are nice, though. I just won't believe it until I see it for myself. ” – nightling

Join the “She does not want to be with me because I'm "too nice".” discussion

“I am kind of on the fence about this one. On the one hand, all the emails and such are kind of a waste of time if there's no chemistry once you meet. However, it does feel safer to me to interact by ... ” – nightling

Join the “Need to know” discussion

“I would purposely try not to get into the wrong line in this scenario, but I have seen a lot of people do it on purpose just because the other lines were "too full". Tough cookies, I say. It's an ... ” – kneo24

Join the “Ever been Caught in the Wrong Line?” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:56 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.0